Designing
Effective Store-release Covers for the Long-Term Containment of Mine Waste
- The Role of Vegetation
Determination
of the Reasons for the Deterioration of the Rum Jungle
Waste Rock Dump Cover
National
Survey of Extent of Acid Mine Drainage and Potential Future Liability
Management
of Sulfidic Mine Wastes (Stage 1)
Designing
Effective Store-release Covers for the Long-Term Containment of Mine Waste
- The Role of Vegetation (Stage 1)
Background |
- A critical
gap in the knowledge required to design dry covers for the long-term
containment of sulfidic and other wastes is the water usage by
different vegetation types.
- This gap
was identified in Stage 1 of the Management of Sulfidic Mine Wastes
Project and by the Operating Committee of the International Network
for Acid Prevention (INAP) at its meeting during the Fourth Australian
Acid Mine Drainage Workshop.
- At subsequent
INAP meetings in 2003 and 2004, the need for this
information was again highlighted.
|
| Objective |
- To review the existing information on water use by major plant communities (and component species) for use in the design of dry covers for mine wastes.
|
| Outcomes |
- Provision
of current quantitative water use data for native plant species for dry
cover design models; and
- Identification of gaps in information on water use by plants required to design sustainable cover systems.
|
Methodology |
- The Stage 1 project,
involved the review of existing information on the water use by
grass, shrub and tree species and communities that have been,
or are likely to be, used for revegetation of waste dumps and
tailings storage facilities across Australia. A workshop was conducted
in August 2004 to identify gaps in information identified by the
Review and further research required on water use by vegetation (Stage 2).
|
| Project
Team |
The review
of literature was conducted by Assoc. Prof David Doley , Centre
for Mined Land Rehabilitation, University of Queensland.
|
| Project
Duration |
Stage 1, 5
Months (2004)
|
| Project
Sponsors |
- International
Network for Acid Prevention (INAP),
- Kagara Zinc
Limited,
- Newcrest
Mining Limited (Cadia Valley Operations),
- Newmont Australia
Limited,
- Queensland
Department of Natural Resources and Mines,
- Zinifex Century
Mine
|
| Project
Summary |
On completion
|
| More
Information |
info@acmer.uq.edu.au
|
Determination
of the Reasons for the Deterioration of the Rum Jungle
Waste
Rock Dump Cover
Background
|
Sulfidic mine
wastes (waste rock, tailings, low grade ore) are commonly covered
with benign material (rock, soil, clay, organic waste etc.) to
reduce the ingress of oxygen and water as a means of controlling
acid mine drainage (AMD).
These
cover materials also provide a substrate for vegetation to reduce
erosion, reduce water infiltration and improve the aesthetics.
Sulfidic mine
wastes at Rum Jungle in the Northern Territory were covered some
15 years ago and have been extensively monitored throughout this
period. Rehabilitation specifications required that the covers
reduced water infiltration to less than 5% of incident rainfall.
This was achieved for the first 10 years. Monitoring suggests
that their performance has deteriorated, with approximately 9.5%
of rainfall infiltrating the dumps over the past few years.
Because of
the availability of detailed rehabilitation specifications and
long term monitoring, Rum Jungle provides an ideal laboratory
to assess why the covers have apparently failed. This information
is vital for the future design of covers to prevent AMD and provide
regulatory authorities with the necessary information for authorising
close-out both in Australia and overseas.
|
Objective |
- To assess
why the performance of the covers on waste rock dumps at Rum Jungle
has declined.
|
Outcomes |
- Provide information
about the future design of covers to prevent AMD; and
- Provide regulatory
authorities with the necessary information for authorising close-out
both in Australia and overseas.
|
Methodology |
- Field and
laboratory techniques were used to determine the present physical,
chemical, mineralogical, biological and hydrological characteristics
of the two waste rock dumps at Rum Jungle and their covers.
- The data
generated has been compared with the technical specifications
used during construction of the covers and monitoring data to
determine the reasons for the apparent deterioration of the covers.
|
|
21 October
2002 to 28 February 2003
|
Project
Team |
The project
is being jointly supervised by Dr John Bennett (ANSTO) and Dr
Graham Taylor (CSIRO).
|
Project
Sponsors |
- International
Network for Acid Prevention (INAP)
- Queensland
Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM)
- Queensland
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
|
Project
Summary |
Report available
on website at: ../publications/attachments/RumJungleReportJuly2003.pdf
|
More
Information |
info@acmer.uq.edu.au |
National
Survey of Extent of Acid Mine Drainage and Potential Future Liability
This study, initiated by the Supervising Scientist Group (Environment
Australia) and the Centre, and supported in principle by the Minerals
Council of Australia, was commenced in January 1996 by Dr J. Harries of
ANSTO. The objectives of the study were:
-
to
quantify and characterise the generation of contaminated drainage
by sulfidic oxidation from historic and current mining activities
in Australia;
-
to
develop a classification scheme to characterise the potential for
off-site impacts from sulfidic oxidation in mine wastes;
-
to
compare the national cost of managing sulfidic oxidation and contaminated
drainage from mining with the national cost of managing acidity from
other sources; and
-
to
make recommendations on the long-term research needs and technology
transfer strategy to improve the understanding and management of acid
mine drainage in Australia.
The national survey
was carried out by visits to mine sites, by discussions with company environmental
officers, State Chambers of Mines, officers from State Departments responsible
for mining and environmental issues, and by distribution of questionnaires
to mine sites. The final report entitled "Acid Mine Drainage in Australia
- Its Extent and Potential Future Liability" by John Harries was
published in July 1997 with recommendations covering four main issues,
viz. rehabilitation technologies, mine planning, waste characterisation
and technical awareness of acid drainage issues.
Project Sponsor:
Environment Australia
The following publication
arising from the project is available from Environment Australia:
Acid Mine Drainage
in Australia: Its Extent and Future Liability (Harries 1997).
[top]
Management
of Sulfidic Mine Wastes (Stage 1)
This project followed a 1-year project by the Centre in conjunction with
the Supervising Scientist Group (Environment Australia) in which Dr John
Harries (ANSTO) produced a report on "Acid Mine Drainage in Australia
- Its Extent and Future Liability".
The recommendations
of this report were the drivers for a subsequent project with the objectives
of:
-
reviewing
current knowledge, industry practice and site-specific research;
-
facilitating
industry awareness and technology transfer; and
-
development
of a strategic plan for management of sulfidic wastes in the long
term.
These objectives were
addressed through the appointment of an ACMER Fellow, Dr Steve Dobos,
and an Industry Liaison Officer, Mr Marshall Lee.
Additional objectives
of this project involved:
-
the
development of a manual of recommended methods (Coordinators - Dr
Graham Taylor (CSIRO) and Dr Andrew Garvie (ANSTO)); and
-
the
comparison of field- and laboratory-measured oxidation rates (Coordinators
- Dr John Bennett (ANSTO) and Dr John Jeffrey (EGI)).
The
following publications arising from the project are available for purchase
from ACMER, which had 8 industry sponsors and Environment Australia:
Handbook 1
Risk Assessment Framework for the Management of Sulfidic Mine Wastes
(Lee 1999).
Handbook 2
Management of Sulfidic Mine Wastes and Acid Drainage (Lee 1999).
Manual of Techniques
to Quantify Processes Associated with Polluted Effluent from Sulfidic
Mine Wastes (Garvie and Taylor 2000).
Manual and CD-Rom available for purchase.
Comparison of Oxidation
Rates of Sulfidic Mine Wastes Measured in the Laboratory and Field (Bennett
et al. 2000).
Click here to download a copy of the report
Project Sponsors:
Aberfoyle Ltd, BHP
Minerals, Pasminco Century Mine Limited, MIM Holdings Limited, Newmont
Australia Limited, Placer Dome Asia Pacific Limited, RGC Limited, Rio
Tinto Limited and the Supervising Scientist Group (Environment Australia).
Click here to view Current Projects
[top]